A lot has changed in the past few years. At first, working from home seemed like a short-term solution. Over time, it became the norm. Now, many employees across Canada are being told to return to the office, often with strict policies and little flexibility.
This leads to a question that’s not as straightforward as it seems. Can your employer actually require you to return? Let’s break it down together.
A return to office policy means your employer asks you to stop working remotely or in a hybrid setup and come back to work on site. In Canada, employers can usually do this, but there are some limits.
Both federal public service and private sector employers can set workplace policies, including where you work. However, these policies can’t override your written contract or make major changes to your job’s key terms without consequences.
This is where things can get complicated. For many employees, especially those who worked remotely for a long time, the sudden shift back to the office can feel abrupt. In some situations, it might even raise legal issues.
There isn’t a single reason for this push. It’s a mix of practical, cultural, and sometimes unclear factors.
Here are some of the main reasons:
Still, none of these reasons automatically gives employers the right to require a return to the office without limits.
The short answer is yes, but there are risks involved. If your contract doesn’t promise remote or hybrid work, your employer can usually change your work location as long as they give you reasonable notice. Sometimes, the situation can get even more unbearable.
However, if remote work became an important part of your job, the situation is different.
Courts look at points such as:
If going back to the office is a major change to a key part of your job, it could be considered constructive dismissal. This means that even if you resign, the law might see it as if you were forced to leave. In that case, you could be entitled to severance.
Yes, but the details of your situation matter. If an employee refuses a lawful request to return to the office, the employer may take disciplinary action, which could include termination in some cases.
But this doesn’t always mean the employer is in the right. Recent disputes, such as the widely reported Bell Canada return-to-office terminations, show that unclear workplace attendance expectations can quickly lead to escalation between employers and employees.
Consider this:
If an employee refuses for a reason protected by human rights law, like family status or caretaking responsibilities, the employer must accommodate them unless it causes undue hardship.
If the employer doesn’t do this, they could be held responsible.
There have already been cases where employees won on appeal because their employers didn’t fully understand their responsibilities.
A widely discussed Canadian return-to-office dispute involved Bell Canada in 2026. Public reports indicate that Bell terminated several employees for cause, alleging non-compliance with its return-to-office requirements. The controversy focused on Bell’s use of office swipe-card data to determine whether employees met attendance criteria under the policy.
The situation received considerable media attention, with many employees arguing that expectations were unclear. Some stated that the return-to-office requirements were not communicated effectively, while others questioned the accuracy of the company’s attendance-tracking methods.
While each case may differ, the Bell Canada situation demonstrates that return-to-office policies can be complex. Employers have the right to set attendance requirements, but employees retain rights if policies are unclear, inconsistently applied, or introduced without reasonable notice.
The Bell situation shows the importance of reviewing workplace policies, documenting communications, and gaining clarification when expectations are unclear. As return-to-office disputes increase in Canada, courts and tribunals will continue to shape how these matters are handled.
Many employers rely on this point. If remote or hybrid work was clearly described as temporary, especially during the pandemic, employers are more likely to succeed in bringing employees back to the office.
But even then, it’s not automatic. Courts will still consider how long the remote arrangement lasted. A few months is different from several years. Over time, even a temporary setup can become an expected part of your job, even if it’s not in writing.
Once something becomes a key part of your job, taking it away without reasonable notice can lead to legal claims. So, the timeline, communication, and expectations all matter. Sometimes, these factors matter even more than the original agreement.
If you’re being asked to return to the office, take your time before making a decision. Pause and consider the whole situation.
Here’s a practical approach:
Check for any details about work location, hybrid schedules, or remote work.
Even small details in your contract can make a difference.
Save copies of emails, policies, and any conversations you have about your work arrangement.
Having this evidence is important if the situation becomes more serious.
Be honest with yourself as you consider the change.
Is this just a small change, or does it have a big impact on your daily life, commute, and responsibilities?
Family status, childcare needs, or even needing to support someone at home can all be important factors.
These aren’t just personal matters—they can also have legal significance.
If you need flexibility, submit a written request for hybrid work arrangements or to continue to work remotely.
Employers are expected to take these into account in good faith.
Quitting too soon can make things more complicated for you.
Sometimes, what seems like your only choice isn’t the best option from a legal standpoint.
This is where things get real.
If a return to office policy effectively forces an employee out, the question becomes whether they were constructively dismissed.
And if so, they may be entitled to severance.
Courts look at:
If an employee quits because their employer suddenly requires them to work on site most of the week, that could support a legal claim.
This is especially true if the change affects their hours, commute, or family responsibilities.
In some cases, employees have won constructive dismissal claims even when employers thought their changes were reasonable.
Often, it comes down to one key question.
Would a reasonable person accept this kind of change?
Before you sign anything. Before you accept or refuse. Before you make a move that can’t be undone. Talk to someone who understands this area of law. Return-to-office mandates are still changing, and courts are still figuring out how to handle these cases.
What seems simple at first is often more complicated.
An experienced lawyer can help you:
Sometimes, just having clear information can make all the difference. If you’re facing a return to office policy and something feels off, trust your instincts. There’s usually a good reason for that feeling. Get in touch with our team today to schedule your consultation.
Our lawyers are ready to help you. Arrange a meeting by calling us at (905) 822-2646 or Email us today.
1715 Lakeshore Road West
Suite 103, Mississauga L5J 1J4
201 CITY CENTRE DRIVE
SUITE 300 MISSISSAUGA, ON L5B 2T4